It’s pathetic that the best argument for Kerry is that Bush isa lousy President and the best argument for Bush is that Kerry will probably be a lousy president.

They both suck. The Bush administration is dishonest, shrouded in secrecy, and extremist. Kerry doesn’t exactly project confidence, and has yet to really define a platform beyond “I’m not Bush.” Granted, I think the “I’m not Bush” gets him half the way there in my book.

Still, the case against Kerry is mostly a vague smattering of inuendo and character assasination. The case against Dubya is 4 years of pathetic extremist leadership, an avoidable war, and an occupation in a terrorist infested nation with absolutely no exit strategy.